Overview
Period: 2026-04-05 to 2026-04-11 (7 days)
Runs analyzed: 50 (44 had token data; 6 cancelled with no data)
Total tokens: 9,238K across 3 workflows
Effective tokens: 2,989K (after Anthropic cache pricing adjustment)
Estimated total cost: $12.39
Total Actions minutes: 232 min
Total turns: 252
Three Claude-engine workflows ran: Security Guard (20 runs), Smoke Claude (23 runs), and Secret Digger (Claude) (7 runs). Overall costs declined significantly vs the previous report — Security Guard avg cost dropped 53% and Smoke Claude dropped 42%. Secret Digger (Claude) continues to exhibit a systemic cache inefficiency where cache writes exceed cache reads on every run.
Workflow Summary
| Workflow |
Runs |
Total Tokens |
Avg Tokens |
Total Cost |
Avg Cost |
Avg Turns |
Errors |
Cache Reuse |
| Security Guard |
20 |
3,731K |
187K |
$4.47 |
$0.22 |
4.8 |
8 (40%) ⚠️ |
82% ✅ |
| Smoke Claude |
23 |
4,623K |
201K |
$4.31 |
$0.19 |
5.8 |
6 (26%) ⚠️ |
83% ✅ |
| Secret Digger (Claude) |
7 |
884K |
126K |
$3.60 |
$0.51 |
3.0 |
0 (0%) ✅ |
49% ⚠️ |
| Total |
50 |
9,238K |
— |
$12.39 |
$0.25 |
5.0 |
14 (28%) |
— |
🔍 Optimization Opportunities
-
Secret Digger (Claude) — Cache write ≥ cache read on every run (49% reuse) ⚠️
- All 7 runs this period show
cache_write ≈ cache_read (~38K each), meaning the cache is created fresh each run and never hit from a prior run. Cross-run caching is not occurring.
- With only 3 turns per run and a short context window, there is minimal intra-run reuse as well.
- Recommendation: Move large static context (system prompt, repository facts, reference data) into a deterministic pre-agent step and pass via
/tmp/gh-aw/agent/ files. This reduces expensive cache-write tokens each run. Consider consolidating runs or scheduling more frequently to improve cross-run cache hit rate.
-
Security Guard — High error rate (8/20 = 40%) ⚠️
- 8 runs with errors is the highest error rate of any workflow. This drives unnecessary retry turns and inflates token costs.
- Two outlier runs consumed disproportionate tokens: §24290111812 (480K tokens, 11 turns, $0.68) and §24271368232 (981K tokens, 24 turns, $0.57).
- Recommendation: Investigate root causes of the 8 erroring runs. The 24-turn outlier suggests an agent retry loop — add a
max_turns guardrail or improve error handling to prevent runaway turns.
-
Smoke Claude — Moderate error rate (6/23 = 26%) ⚠️
- Approaching the 30% error threshold. Each erroring run wastes tokens on incomplete work.
- Recommendation: Review error patterns to determine if these are infrastructure failures or agent logic errors. If systematic, consider adding retry logic or pre-flight checks.
-
Security Guard — High token variance
- Avg is 187K/run but two runs exceeded 480K and 981K. High variance suggests the workflow is sensitive to input size or agent path choices.
- Recommendation: Add input size guards or deterministic pre-processing steps to bound the agent's search space.
Per-Workflow Details
Security Guard
- Runs: 20 (§24290215023, §24290111812, §24289182705, §24289175288, §24287824916, and 15 more)
- Total tokens: 3,731K (avg 187K/run)
- Effective tokens: 1,461K
- Estimated cost: $4.47 (avg $0.22/run)
- Turns: 97 total (avg 4.8/run)
- Model: claude-sonnet-4-6 (Anthropic)
- Cache analysis: 3,693K read / 817K write → 82% reuse rate ✅
- Error rate: 8/20 runs (40%) ⚠️ — includes 6 cancelled runs with no token data
- Notable outliers:
- §24290111812: 480K tokens, 11 turns, $0.68 (most expensive run in period)
- §24271368232: 981K tokens, 24 turns, $0.57 (most turns in period — potential retry loop)
Smoke Claude
- Runs: 23 (§24290111810, §24290215008, §24289182699, §24289175294, §24287824928, and 18 more)
- Total tokens: 4,623K (avg 201K/run)
- Effective tokens: 1,186K
- Estimated cost: $4.31 (avg $0.19/run)
- Turns: 134 total (avg 5.8/run)
- Model: claude-sonnet-4-6 (Anthropic)
- Cache analysis: 3,789K read / 749K write → 83% reuse rate ✅
- Error rate: 6/23 runs (26%) ⚠️
Secret Digger (Claude)
- Runs: 7 (§24012669686, §24011656105, §24010635315, §24009579929, §24008628142, §24007580596, §24006466570)
- Total tokens: 884K (avg 126K/run)
- Effective tokens: 343K
- Estimated cost: $3.60 (avg $0.51/run)
- Turns: 21 total (avg 3.0/run)
- Model: claude-sonnet-4-6 (Anthropic)
- Cache analysis: 265K read / 274K write → 49% reuse rate ⚠️ — cache writes exceed reads on every run; cross-run caching is not occurring
- Error rate: 0/7 runs (0%) ✅
- Note: Very consistent runs — cost ranges from $0.49 to $0.54/run with nearly identical token counts, suggesting a deterministic input pattern with no cache warming across invocations.
Runs Without Token Data
6 runs were cancelled before completing and have no token data:
All 6 are cancelled runs — api-proxy data was not collected. No instrumentation changes needed.
Historical Trend
Comparing to the previous report (§1888 covering 2026-04-05 to 2026-04-10):
| Workflow |
Prev Avg Cost |
Curr Avg Cost |
Change |
Prev Avg Turns |
Curr Avg Turns |
Change |
| Security Guard |
$0.47 |
$0.22 |
✅ -53% |
8.6 |
4.8 |
✅ -44% |
| Smoke Claude |
$0.33 |
$0.19 |
✅ -42% |
6.2 |
5.8 |
✅ -6% |
| Secret Digger (Claude) |
$0.50 |
$0.51 |
➡️ +2% |
3.0 |
3.0 |
➡️ stable |
Security Guard and Smoke Claude both show significant cost improvements this period, likely due to improvements in agent efficiency or prompt changes. Secret Digger (Claude) remains flat — the cache inefficiency noted in prior reports persists unresolved.
Previous Report
§1888 — 2026-04-10 report
References:
Generated by Daily Claude Token Usage Analyzer · ● 466.4K · ◷
Overview
Period: 2026-04-05 to 2026-04-11 (7 days)
Runs analyzed: 50 (44 had token data; 6 cancelled with no data)
Total tokens: 9,238K across 3 workflows
Effective tokens: 2,989K (after Anthropic cache pricing adjustment)
Estimated total cost: $12.39
Total Actions minutes: 232 min
Total turns: 252
Three Claude-engine workflows ran: Security Guard (20 runs), Smoke Claude (23 runs), and Secret Digger (Claude) (7 runs). Overall costs declined significantly vs the previous report — Security Guard avg cost dropped 53% and Smoke Claude dropped 42%. Secret Digger (Claude) continues to exhibit a systemic cache inefficiency where cache writes exceed cache reads on every run.
Workflow Summary
🔍 Optimization Opportunities
Secret Digger (Claude) — Cache write ≥ cache read on every run (49% reuse)⚠️
cache_write ≈ cache_read(~38K each), meaning the cache is created fresh each run and never hit from a prior run. Cross-run caching is not occurring./tmp/gh-aw/agent/files. This reduces expensive cache-write tokens each run. Consider consolidating runs or scheduling more frequently to improve cross-run cache hit rate.Security Guard — High error rate (8/20 = 40%)⚠️
max_turnsguardrail or improve error handling to prevent runaway turns.Smoke Claude — Moderate error rate (6/23 = 26%)⚠️
Security Guard — High token variance
Per-Workflow Details
Security Guard
Smoke Claude
Secret Digger (Claude)
Runs Without Token Data
6 runs were cancelled before completing and have no token data:
All 6 are cancelled runs — api-proxy data was not collected. No instrumentation changes needed.
Historical Trend
Comparing to the previous report (§1888 covering 2026-04-05 to 2026-04-10):
Security Guard and Smoke Claude both show significant cost improvements this period, likely due to improvements in agent efficiency or prompt changes. Secret Digger (Claude) remains flat — the cache inefficiency noted in prior reports persists unresolved.
Previous Report
§1888 — 2026-04-10 report
References: