feat(algorithms, trie, index pairs): index pairs of strings#195
feat(algorithms, trie, index pairs): index pairs of strings#195BrianLusina wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughA new Trie-based algorithm is introduced to find all index pairs of words within a text string. The implementation includes the primary algorithm, comprehensive documentation explaining the approach, and test coverage with multiple fixtures validating the solution. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~25 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
algorithms/trie/index_pairs_of_a_string/__init__.py (1)
13-13: Nit: unused loop variable.
charfromenumerate(text)is never read inside the outer loop (the inner loop re-reads viatext[j]). Considerfor idx in range(len(text)):to make that explicit.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@algorithms/trie/index_pairs_of_a_string/__init__.py` at line 13, The outer loop currently uses "for idx, char in enumerate(text):" but "char" is never used; change it to a loop that makes intent explicit (e.g., "for idx in range(len(text)):" or "for idx, _ in enumerate(text):") in the function that iterates over the variable text (the outer loop that contains the inner loop accessing text[j]) so the unused loop variable warning is removed and intent is clearer.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@algorithms/trie/index_pairs_of_a_string/__init__.py`:
- Around line 4-31: Add a docstring with a concise description of
index_pairs(text, words) inputs and return semantics and include at least one
doctest example; update the index_pairs function (which uses Trie, trie.insert,
trie.root and node.is_end) to have a top-level triple-quoted docstring that
documents parameters and return value and contains a runnable doctest (for
example using text = "thestoryofleetcodeandme", words =
["story","fleet","leetcode"] expecting [[3,7],[9,13]] or another existing
fixture) so automated tests pick it up.
In `@algorithms/trie/index_pairs_of_a_string/README.md`:
- Around line 44-48: Update the "Time Complexity" paragraph to accurately
separate trie construction and search phases: state total complexity as O(n*m +
l*k) (with worst-case search O(l^2)), where n and m refer to the number/average
length of words used to build the trie and l and k refer to the text length and
average/matched word length respectively; explicitly note that l*k describes the
entire search phase across all start indices (not per-index), and keep the
alternative worst-case O(n*m + l^2) to cover degenerate cases.
---
Nitpick comments:
In `@algorithms/trie/index_pairs_of_a_string/__init__.py`:
- Line 13: The outer loop currently uses "for idx, char in enumerate(text):" but
"char" is never used; change it to a loop that makes intent explicit (e.g., "for
idx in range(len(text)):" or "for idx, _ in enumerate(text):") in the function
that iterates over the variable text (the outer loop that contains the inner
loop accessing text[j]) so the unused loop variable warning is removed and
intent is clearer.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 15576026-591f-4789-98ee-b17a74d651f6
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
algorithms/trie/index_pairs_of_a_string/images/examples/index_pairs_of_a_string_example_1.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngalgorithms/trie/index_pairs_of_a_string/images/examples/index_pairs_of_a_string_example_2.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngalgorithms/trie/index_pairs_of_a_string/images/examples/index_pairs_of_a_string_example_3.pngis excluded by!**/*.png
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
DIRECTORY.mdalgorithms/trie/index_pairs_of_a_string/README.mdalgorithms/trie/index_pairs_of_a_string/__init__.pyalgorithms/trie/index_pairs_of_a_string/test_index_pairs_of_a_string.py
| def index_pairs(text: str, words: List[str]) -> List[List[int]]: | ||
| trie = Trie() | ||
|
|
||
| for word in words: | ||
| trie.insert(word) | ||
|
|
||
| results = [] | ||
|
|
||
| # loop through each character in the text | ||
| for idx, char in enumerate(text): | ||
| # start from the root of the Trie for each character in the text | ||
| node = trie.root | ||
|
|
||
| # Check each possible substring starting from index idx | ||
| for j in range(idx, len(text)): | ||
| ch = text[j] | ||
| # If the character is not in the current Trie Node's children, stop searching | ||
| if ch not in node.children: | ||
| break | ||
|
|
||
| # Move to the next node in the Trie | ||
| node = node.children[ch] | ||
|
|
||
| # If we reach the end of a word, record the indices | ||
| if node.is_end: | ||
| results.append([idx, j]) | ||
|
|
||
| return results |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Missing docstring/doctest on the public function.
The PR checklist commits to "All functions include doctests that pass automated testing", but index_pairs has neither a docstring nor doctests. Please add a brief docstring describing text/words/return semantics and at least one doctest (e.g. reusing one of the test fixtures) so it conforms to the repository's contribution guideline.
📝 Suggested docstring with doctest
def index_pairs(text: str, words: List[str]) -> List[List[int]]:
+ """
+ Returns all index pairs [i, j] such that text[i..j] (inclusive) is in words,
+ sorted by i then by j.
+
+ >>> index_pairs("howareyou", ["how", "are", "you"])
+ [[0, 2], [3, 5], [6, 8]]
+ >>> index_pairs("xyxyx", ["xyx", "xy"])
+ [[0, 1], [0, 2], [2, 3], [2, 4]]
+ """
trie = Trie()🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In `@algorithms/trie/index_pairs_of_a_string/__init__.py` around lines 4 - 31, Add
a docstring with a concise description of index_pairs(text, words) inputs and
return semantics and include at least one doctest example; update the
index_pairs function (which uses Trie, trie.insert, trie.root and node.is_end)
to have a top-level triple-quoted docstring that documents parameters and return
value and contains a runnable doctest (for example using text =
"thestoryofleetcodeandme", words = ["story","fleet","leetcode"] expecting
[[3,7],[9,13]] or another existing fixture) so automated tests pick it up.
| ### Time Complexity | ||
|
|
||
| Inserting n words of average length m into the trie takes O(n∗m). For each index i in text, we perform a search that | ||
| takes linear time in the length of the substring. This gives an overall time complexity of O(l∗k), where l is the length | ||
| of the text, and k is the average length of a word. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Time complexity statement is inconsistent/under-stated.
The stated complexity O(l*k) ignores the outer loop over every start index in text. The algorithm performs, for each of the l starting positions, a trie walk of up to k (or up to l) characters, yielding O(l*k) or O(l^2) for the search phase — plus O(n*m) for trie construction. As written, the expression conflates the per-start-index traversal cost with the total search cost. Consider stating it as O(n*m + l*k) total (or O(n*m + l^2) worst case) and clarifying that l*k is the search phase, not a per-index cost.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~46-~46: Possible missing article found.
Context: ... trie takes O(n∗m). For each index i in text, we perform a search that takes linear ...
(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_THE)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In `@algorithms/trie/index_pairs_of_a_string/README.md` around lines 44 - 48,
Update the "Time Complexity" paragraph to accurately separate trie construction
and search phases: state total complexity as O(n*m + l*k) (with worst-case
search O(l^2)), where n and m refer to the number/average length of words used
to build the trie and l and k refer to the text length and average/matched word
length respectively; explicitly note that l*k describes the entire search phase
across all start indices (not per-index), and keep the alternative worst-case
O(n*m + l^2) to cover degenerate cases.
Describe your change:
Index Pairs of strings
Checklist:
Fixes: #{$ISSUE_NO}.Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Documentation
Tests