Open
Conversation
… sequences, moved spatial gradient calculation to own function.
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #652 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 91.22% 91.16% -0.06%
==========================================
Files 57 58 +1
Lines 3248 3250 +2
==========================================
Hits 2963 2963
- Misses 285 287 +2
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
KomaMRI Benchmarks
Details
| Benchmark suite | Current: 17e586e | Previous: 11d3180 | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
MRI Lab/Bloch/CPU/2 thread(s) |
387199837.5 ns |
337633469 ns |
1.15 |
MRI Lab/Bloch/CPU/4 thread(s) |
289067546 ns |
276282606 ns |
1.05 |
MRI Lab/Bloch/CPU/8 thread(s) |
242467570.5 ns |
209852165 ns |
1.16 |
MRI Lab/Bloch/CPU/1 thread(s) |
655549193 ns |
555065232 ns |
1.18 |
MRI Lab/Bloch/GPU/CUDA |
20962776 ns |
21231134 ns |
0.99 |
MRI Lab/Bloch/GPU/oneAPI |
85944808 ns |
77053690 ns |
1.12 |
MRI Lab/Bloch/GPU/Metal |
104643083 ns |
95540333 ns |
1.10 |
MRI Lab/Bloch/GPU/AMDGPU |
25102288 ns |
24763685 ns |
1.01 |
Slice Selection 3D/Bloch/CPU/2 thread(s) |
1651013192 ns |
1592087059 ns |
1.04 |
Slice Selection 3D/Bloch/CPU/4 thread(s) |
911694348 ns |
889539516 ns |
1.02 |
Slice Selection 3D/Bloch/CPU/8 thread(s) |
599249406.5 ns |
565401528.5 ns |
1.06 |
Slice Selection 3D/Bloch/CPU/1 thread(s) |
3109371230 ns |
3029269071 ns |
1.03 |
Slice Selection 3D/Bloch/GPU/CUDA |
31822745 ns |
32639703 ns |
0.97 |
Slice Selection 3D/Bloch/GPU/oneAPI |
133804680 ns |
121489006.5 ns |
1.10 |
Slice Selection 3D/Bloch/GPU/Metal |
112492041 ns |
111152750 ns |
1.01 |
Slice Selection 3D/Bloch/GPU/AMDGPU |
32559879.5 ns |
32636098 ns |
1.00 |
This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.
Member
|
The macos fails are due to actions/runner-images#13341. |
Member
|
Compare benchmarks with #653. Update: macos cache problem fixed. |
cncastillo
requested changes
Nov 24, 2025
Member
cncastillo
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks very good, no significant performance regressions, but some of them could be explained by some of the suggestions below.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In preparation for higher order sequences, this adds: