Skip to content

perf(linux): Update Ethernet performance data for 12.00.00.07#668

Open
danish-ti wants to merge 1 commit intoTexasInstruments:masterfrom
danish-ti:perf-doc-12.00
Open

perf(linux): Update Ethernet performance data for 12.00.00.07#668
danish-ti wants to merge 1 commit intoTexasInstruments:masterfrom
danish-ti:perf-doc-12.00

Conversation

@danish-ti
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Update TCP Bidir, TCP Bidir Interrupt Pacing, UDP Egress (0-loss) and UDP Ingress (0-loss) performance tables for the following platforms:

  • AM62X (CPSW3g: am62xx_sk-fs, am62xx_lp_sk-fs, am62xxsip_sk-fs)
  • AM62PX (CPSW3g: am62pxx_sk-fs)
  • AM62LX (CPSW3g: am62lxx_evm-fs)
  • AM62DX (CPSW3g: am62dxx_evm-fs)
  • AM64X RT (CPSW2G + ICSSG: am64xx-hsevm)

UDP Ingress numbers are reported from the 0-loss test cases only.

@StaticRocket
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@danish-ti danish-ti force-pushed the perf-doc-12.00 branch 2 times, most recently from 40fbe9d to a556c21 Compare April 15, 2026 05:22
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

New warnings found with rstcheck:

source/devices/AM64X/linux/RT_Linux_Performance_Guide.rst:402: (INFO/1) Duplicate implicit target name: "tcp bidirectional throughput".
source/devices/AM64X/linux/RT_Linux_Performance_Guide.rst:414: (INFO/1) Duplicate implicit target name: "tcp bidirectional throughput interrupt pacing".

Update TCP Bidir, TCP Bidir Interrupt Pacing, UDP Egress (0-loss) and
UDP Ingress (0-loss) performance tables for the following platforms:
- AM62X (CPSW3g: am62xx_sk-fs, am62xx_lp_sk-fs, am62xxsip_sk-fs)
- AM62PX (CPSW3g: am62pxx_sk-fs)
- AM62LX (CPSW3g: am62lxx_evm-fs)
- AM62DX (CPSW3g: am62dxx_evm-fs)
- AM64X RT (CPSW2G + ICSSG: am64xx-hsevm)

UDP Ingress numbers are reported from the 0-loss test cases only.

Fix duplicate implicit target names in AM64X RT guide by qualifying
ICSSG TCP Bidirectional Throughput section headings uniquely.

Signed-off-by: MD Danish Anwar <danishanwar@ti.com>
@danish-ti
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

All the vale comments are the same. [RedHat.Spelling] Verify the word 'netperf'. It is not in the American English or Red Hat terminology spelling dictionaries used by Vale. What should be the resolution for this? @StaticRocket @cshilwant ?

@StaticRocket
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

StaticRocket commented Apr 15, 2026

Eh, don't worry about vale warnings on this file. Too many other issues with it at the moment that I've been trying to fix. Guess that reminds me I need to resubmit that old PR to rework all of the templating for that page.

Usually though, commands should be wrapped in

``<x>``

or

:command:`<x>`

Which indicates to vale not to be as strict about spelling.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants